Innodata Inc.
AI Agentic Workflow Reviewer
In Office - San Jose, California
Get past the screening software and onto a recruiter's desk
hirly rewrites your resume for this job — matching the keywords and skills in the posting, moving your most relevant experience to the top, and writing a cover letter to fit. About 30 seconds.
- Keywords matched to this posting
- Fit score before you apply
- Cover letter included
Matched against 2.3M live jobs from 200,000+ employers in 200+ countries.
Tailor my resume for this job →hirly's read of this role
- Seniority
- Mid level
- Country
- US
- Work mode
- On-site / unstated
- First seen by hirly
- 28 Sept 2026
Derived automatically from the posting. Upload your resume above to see how the role scores against it.
the posting
Innodata (Nasdaq: INOD) is a global data engineering company. We believe that data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are inextricably linked. Our mission is to enable the responsible advancement of artificial intelligence by providing the data, evaluation frameworks, and human expertise required to build AI systems that can be trusted at scale. We provide a range of transferable solutions, platforms, and services for Generative AI / AI builders and adopters. In every relationship, we honor our 36+ year legacy delivering the highest quality data and outstanding outcomes for our customers.
Scope of the Role:
We're building a dedicated reviewer team to evaluate complex, real-world agentic AI workflows, assessing whether AI agents complete tasks safely, respect user intent and consent, and hold up under close scrutiny. This isn't routine content moderation: reviewers work through ambiguous, multi-step scenarios where judgment calls matter as much as checklists. You'll operate inside isolated test environments, apply structured rubrics, and help calibrate what "safe and policy adherent agent behavior" actually looks like.
What You’ll Own:
Review multi-step agent task trajectories against rubric-based criteria covering task success, safety, and policy adherence
Evaluate whether an agent respected user agency and informed consent — not just whether it followed literal instructions
Apply privacy guardrails when reviewing tasks involving sensitive or personal data
Work inside isolated test environments, including verifying environment resets between test runs to prevent cross-contamination
Flag and escalate safety-relevant or ambiguous findings through defined escalation paths
You’ll Thrive in This Role If You Have:
Bachelor's degree or equivalent practical experience
2–5+ years in quality review, QA/QC, trust & safety, content moderation, data annotation, or a similarly judgment-intensive review role
Strong written communication – you can justify a scoring decision clearly enough for someone else to audit it
Comfort with ambiguity and structured decision-making under a rubric, rather than needing a fixed rulebook for every case
Baseline understanding of AI/ML concepts and how AI agents complete tasks (can be learned through onboarding, but some familiarity helps)
The expected hourly salary range for this position is $50-$55p/hour, based on experience, skills, and qualifications.
Please be aware of recruitment scams involving individuals or organizations falsely claiming to represent employers. Innodata will never ask for payment, banking details, or sensitive personal information during the application process. To learn more on how to recognize job scams, please visit the Federal Trade Commission’s guide at https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/job-scams.
If you believe you’ve been targeted by a recruitment scam, please report it to Innodata at [email protected] and consider reporting it to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov .
Want this one?
Upload your resume and hirly rewrites it for this job and writes the cover letter — in about thirty seconds, before you sign up.
Tailor my resume for this job